"I guess you could say the project originally started way back in 2005 when JD Jones sent me one of his 300 Whisper uppers and a set of dies. This cartridge seemed like a good idea to me. In order for it to fire heavy subsonic bullets, a short case with minimal powder capacity was required. Being an avid hunter, my primary interest was terminal performance, and the 300 Whisper just didn't get the job done for me. So, at that point, I moved on to the 6.8 SPC and did a lot of work with it and killed a LOT of hogs and deer.
I've always been a bigger bullet is better bullet guy and a .277" diameter bullet just wasn't exactly what I wanted. Then, in 2008, Remington came out with the .30 Rem AR, and I started getting the terminal performance on the game that I was after. However, that caliber has its share of issues, such as a proprietary upper receiver, bolt carrier group, and magazine. Then you add on the fact that shortly after Remington brought this caliber to market, they quit supporting it. I never did understand this.
Along came the 300 Blackout that Robert Silvers sent me early on for testing. I didn't see any terminal performance improvement over the 6.8SPC with 110-125gr bullets, and it didn't shoot nearly as flat. I briefly tried shooting hogs with heavy subsonic bullets, but the rainbow trajectory and poor bullet performance on game animals turned me off quickly.
This brings us up to the 7.62×40 originally the brainchild of Kurt Buchert. Kurt's cartridge, which Wilson Combat brought to market as the 7.62x40WT, is a well-balanced cartridge that met Kurt's requirement for it to accept virtually every .30 caliber bullet in the 110-135gr weight range. However, to achieve this with the long-pointed bullets, the case length had to be limited to 1.565" (40mm). Don't get me wrong, I really like the 7.62×40 and have done a lot of successful hunting with it. But I always wanted more, to at least equal the legendary and time-proven .30-30 Winchester in terminal performance.
So, I came up with this quest to create a .30 caliber cartridge that could be fired from an AR-15 platform utilizing the original 5.56 bolt, and I was going to call it the .30-30AR. Obviously, the logical place to start was with Kurt's 7.62×40. As I mentioned above, the problem was a lack of powder capacity, so the first thing I did was to lengthen the throat by .060" to allow the bullets to be seated out longer. This didn't gain anything with the long, nose-pointed bullets already seated out to maximum magazine length. It allowed me to seat bullets designed for the .30-30 out an additional .060", giving me an additional grain of powder and reducing pressure due to the larger case volume. The result is that I gained about 50 fps with the Speer 130gr HC, which proved to be a very terminally effective projectile.
Now, I have a problem: we can't just start chambering the 7.62x40WT with a different chamber! Also, in my opinion, the two main factors that prevented the 7.62x40WT from being more successful in the marketplace were the name and the other bad timing. When Wilson Combat releases a new and similar cartridge at basically the same time as the SAAMI-approved 300 Blackout with Remington Arms behind it, let's face it, who's going to win? Therefore, a minor facelift of the 7.62x40WT wasn't going to meet my goals for this project, even if I could get close to the .30-30 in performance. So here I am back to powder capacity, or the lack of and the first step is to determine which bullets the cartridge must be compatible with and decide if this selection is adequate to meet all of the goals for the intended use of the cartridge (hunting, target and tactical).
Once I answered yes, measurements were made to determine how long the case could be and still work with the bullets I had selected. This was .040" longer than the 7.62×40 or .260" longer than the 300 Blackout. At this point, I called Pacific Tool and Gage and worked with Dave Kiff to finalize a chamber reamer. The reamer arrived in early January 2018, and my testing began.
It was immediately apparent that there was potential and that we could probably gain 100 fps over the 7.62×40 and a lot more over the 300 Blackout. My good friend Terrill Hoffman and I shot thousands of rounds testing loads and barrel twist rates since I also wanted this cartridge to be optimized for accuracy.
Then one day I was corresponding with Ron Reiber of Hodgdon Powder Company and he strongly suggested that we try their new CFEBLK powder. To make this long story shorter, this ended up being a game changer and the final piece to the puzzle. It gave us improved accuracy and more velocity with less pressure, allowing me to exceed my original velocity goals. Once I decided on a 1-15 twist rate for the barrels and we were good on ballistic performance and accuracy, all that was left was to decide on a name and test real-world terminal performance.
During the early testing, we called it the .30-30AR. That was the name on the original chamber reamer print and what we engraved on early test barrels. My buddy Terrill said something to the effect of "Only us old guys know and care much about the old thuty-thuty". So we came up with a bunch of potential names, and someone at the shop said, “We just came out with the 458 HAM'R, and we have a trademark on HAM'R, so let's call it the 300 HAM'R"! Now 13 years later, THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of rounds downrange, several scrap barrels, one upper blown up, and thousands of dead Texas feral hogs, we have the 300 HAM'R that not only meets all of my original goals but EXCEEDS them!"
– Bill Wilson